LONDON (AP) — Prince Harry’s fight for police protection in the U.K. received another setback on Monday, when a judge rejected his request to appeal an earlier ruling upholding a government panel’s decision to limit his access to publicly funded security after giving up his status as a working member of the royal family.
The long-running legal battle began more than four years ago when Harry challenged the panel’s decision, arguing that he and his family still needed an armed security detail because of hostility directed toward him and his wife Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, on social media and relentless hounding by the news media.
But High Court Judge Peter Lane ruled in February that the panel’s decision, which provides for “bespoke” security on an as-needed basis, wasn’t unlawful, irrational or unjustified.
“Insofar as the case-by-case approach may otherwise have caused difficulties, they have not been shown to be such as to overcome the high hurdle so as to render the decision-making irrational,” Lane wrote in his 51-page ruling.
Related articles:
Related suggestion:
Sarah Jessica Parker reveals she couldn't sit DOWN in structured corset gown at Met Gala 2024Wood scores 11:03 in OT as Avalanche finish off 3Uber, Shopify fall; Lyft, Arista Networks rise, Wednesday, 5/8/2024Missouri's GOP Gov. Mike Parson signs law expanding voucherDemocrats commit $7 million to TV ads in five key state Senate racesNemo, among the favorites at Eurovision, is finding acceptance onstage and offBrainteaser contains the genuine logos of popular brands hidden among fakesAB InBev reports higherNemo, among the favorites at Eurovision, is finding acceptance onstage and offTrucker acquitted in deadly crash asks for license back, but state says he contributed to accident
2.3186s , 6499.0390625 kb
Copyright © 2024 Powered by Prince Harry in legal setback about security protection in UK ,Global Grooves news portal